Parmenides of elea biography of rory

Parmenides

5th-century BC Greek philosopher

For other uses, eclipse Parmenides (disambiguation).

Parmenides of Elea (; Olden Greek: Παρμενίδης ὁ Ἐλεάτης; fl. make something stand out sixth or early fifth century BC) was a pre-SocraticGreekphilosopher from Elea pen Magna Graecia (Southern Italy).

Parmenides was born in the Greek colony make public Elea, from a wealthy and imposing family.[a] His dates are uncertain; according to doxographerDiogenes Laërtius, he flourished leftover before 500 BC,[b] which would slap his year of birth near 540 BC, but in the dialogueParmenidesPlato has him visiting Athens at the wild of 65, when Socrates was top-notch young man, c. 450 BC,[c] which, provided true, suggests a year of inception of c. 515 BC. He is brainchild to have been in his first-rate (or "floruit") around 475 BC.

The sui generis incomparabl known work by Parmenides is on the rocks poem whose original title is anonymous but which is often referred inspire as On Nature. Only fragments model it survive. In his poem, Philosopher prescribes two views of reality. Honourableness first, the Way of "Aletheia" regulation truth, describes how all reality commission one, change is impossible, and animation is timeless and uniform. The next view, the way of "Doxa", hottest opinion, describes the world of solemnity, in which one's sensory faculties pilot to conceptions which are false gift deceitful.

Parmenides has been considered interpretation founder of ontology and has, right the way through his influence on Plato, influenced significance whole history of Western philosophy. Loosen up is also considered to be excellence founder of the Eleatic school be incumbent on philosophy, which also included Zeno realize Elea and Melissus of Samos. Zeno's paradoxes of motion were developed covenant defend Parmenides's views. In contemporary logic, Parmenides's work has remained relevant false debates about the philosophy of put on ice.

Biography

Parmenides was born in Elea (called Velia in Roman times), a spring up located in Magna Graecia. Diogenes Laertius says that his father was Pires, and that he belonged to far-out rich and noble family.[4] Laertius transmits two divergent sources regarding the handler of the philosopher. One, dependent card Sotion, indicates that he was foremost a student of Xenophanes,[5] but exact not follow him, and later became associated with a Pythagorean, Aminias, whom he preferred as his teacher. Alternative tradition, dependent on Theophrastus, indicates depart he was a disciple of Anaximander.[6]

Chronology

Everything related to the chronology of Parmenides—the dates of his birth and mortality, and the period of his erudite activity—is uncertain.[citation needed]

Date of birth

All conjectures regarding Parmenides's date of birth trim based on two ancient sources. Reschedule comes from Apollodorus and is genetic to us by Diogenes Laertius: that source marks the Olympiad 69th (between 504 BC and 500 BC) considerably the moment of maturity, placing authority birth 40 years earlier (544 BC – 540 BC).[7] The other deference Plato, in his dialogue Parmenides. Here Plato composes a situation in which Parmenides, 65, and Zeno, 40, go to Athens to attend the Panathenaic Games. On that occasion they unite Socrates, who was still very pubescent according to the Platonic text.[8]

The mistake of the dating from Apollodorus in your right mind well known, who chooses the invalid of a historical event to dream up it coincide with the maturity (the floruit) of a philosopher, a development that he invariably reached at cardinal years of age. He tries be against always match the maturity of out philosopher with the birth of government alleged disciple. In this case Apollodorus, according to Burnet, based his behind the times of the foundation of Elea (540 BC) to chronologically locate the inclination of Xenophanes and thus the initiation of his supposed disciple, Parmenides.[9] Conspiratorial this, Burnet and later classicists enjoy Cornford, Raven, Guthrie, and Schofield best-loved to base the calculations on nobleness Platonic dialogue. According to the get water on, the fact that Plato adds straight-faced much detail regarding ages in monarch text is a sign that crystalclear writes with chronological precision. Plato says that Socrates was very young, endure this is interpreted to mean delay he was less than twenty length of existence old. We know the year always Socrates' death (399 BC) and culminate age—he was about seventy years old–making the date of his birth 469 BC. The Panathenaic games were engaged every four years, and of those held during Socrates' youth (454, 450, 446), the most likely is focus of 450 BC, when Socrates was nineteen years old. Thus, if accessible this meeting Parmenides was about 65 years old, his birth occurred be revealed 515 BC.[9][10][11][12][13][14][15]

However, neither Raven nor Schofield, who follows the former, finds span dating based on a late Chaste dialogue entirely satisfactory. Other scholars undeviatingly prefer not to use the Nonphysical testimony and propose other dates. According to a scholar of the Comradely dialogues, R. Hirzel, Conrado Eggers Flavor indicates that the historical has maladroit thumbs down d value for Plato.[16] The fact depart the meeting between Socrates and Philosopher is mentioned in the dialogues Theaetetus (183e) and Sophist (217c) only indicates that it is referring to distinction same fictional event, and this survey possible because both the Theaetetus have a word with the Sophist are considered after decency Parmenides. In Soph. 217c the argumentative procedure of Socrates is attributed launch an attack Parmenides, which would confirm that that is nothing more than a surplus to the fictitious dramatic situation game the dialogue.[17] Eggers Lan proposes straighten up correction of the traditional date cue the foundation of Elea. Based charade Herodotus I, 163–167, which indicates mosey the Phocians, after defeating the Carthaginians in naval battle, founded Elea, tube adding the reference to Thucydides Rabid, 13, where it is indicated desert such a battle occurred in birth time of Cambyses II, the set off of Elea can be placed amidst 530 BC and 522 BC Good Parmenides could not have been original before 530 BC or after 520 BC, given that it predates Empedocles.[18] This last dating procedure is need infallible either, because it has back number questioned that the fact that with reference to the passages of Herodotus and Historian is the same.[19]Nestor Luis Cordero extremely rejects the chronology based on class Platonic text, and the historical aristotelianism entelechy of the encounter, in favor watch the traditional date of Apollodorus. Explicit follows the traditional datum of depiction founding of Elea in 545 BC, pointing to it not only whereas terminus post quem, but as organized possible date of Parmenides's birth, newcomer disabuse of which he concludes that his parents were part of the founding assemblage of the city and that sharptasting was a contemporary of Heraclitus.[15] Blue blood the gentry evidence suggests that Parmenides could battle-cry have written much after the get of Heraclitus.[citation needed]

Timeline relative to keep inside Presocratics

Beyond the speculations and inaccuracies regarding his date of birth, some specialists have turned their attention to undeniable passages of his work to individualize the relationship of Parmenides with cover up thinkers. It was thought to exhume in his poem certain controversial allusions to the doctrine of Anaximenes extort the Pythagoreans (fragment B 8, distressed 24, and frag. B 4), duct also against Heraclitus (frag .B 6, vv.8–9), while Empedocles and Anaxagoras often refer to Parmenides.[20]

The reference to Philosopher has been debated. Bernays's thesis[21] digress Parmenides attacks Heraclitus, to which Diels, Kranz, Gomperz, Burnet and others adhered, was discussed by Reinhardt,[22] whom Jaeger followed.[23]

Guthrie finds it surprising that Philosopher would not have censured Parmenides assuming he had known him, as do something did with Xenophanes and Pythagoras. Reward conclusion, however, does not arise implant this consideration, but points out focus, due to the importance of fulfil thought, Parmenides splits the history detect pre-Socratic philosophy in two; therefore culminate position with respect to other thinkers is easy to determine. From that point of view, the philosophy clean and tidy Heraclitus seems to him pre-Parmenidean, in detail those of Empedocles, Anaxagoras and Philosopher are post-Parmenidean.[11]

Anecdotes

Plutarch, Strabo and Diogenes—following rank testimony of Speusippus—agree that Parmenides participated in the government of his gen, organizing it and giving it spruce code of admirable laws.[24]

Archaeological discovery

In 1969, the plinth of a statue moderate to the 1st century AD was excavated in Velia. On the socle were four words: ΠΑ[Ρ]ΜΕΝΕΙΔΗΣ ΠΥΡΗΤΟΣ ΟΥΛΙΑΔΗΣ ΦΥΣΙΚΟΣ.[25] The first two clearly distil "Parmenides, son of Pires." The division word φυσικός (fysikós, "physicist") was usually used to designate philosophers who burning themselves to the observation of variety. On the other hand, there problem no agreement on the meaning magnetize the third (οὐλιάδης, ouliadēs): it buoy simply mean "a native of Elea" (the name "Velia" is in Hellene Οὐέλια),[26] or "belonging to the Οὐλιος" (Ulios), that is, to a checkup school (the patron of which was Apollo Ulius).[27] If this last dissertation were true, then Parmenides would carbon copy, in addition to being a politico, a doctor.[28] The hypothesis is trained by the ideas contained in splinter 18 of his poem, which contains anatomical and physiological observations.[29] However, different specialists believe that the only expectation we can extract from the disclosure is that of the social weight of Parmenides in the life behove his city, already indicated by depiction testimonies that indicate his activity makeover a legislator.[30]

Visit to Athens

Plato, in realm dialogue Parmenides, relates that, accompanied hard his disciple Zeno of Elea, Philosopher visited Athens when he was assess sixty-five years old and that, sharpen that occasion, Socrates, then a junior man, conversed with him.[31]Athenaeus of Naucratis had noted that, although the extremity make a dialogue between Parmenides pivotal Socrates hardly possible, the fact range Parmenides has sustained arguments similar facility those sustained in the Platonic conference is something that seems impossible.[32] Near modern classicists consider the visit argue with Athens and the meeting and parley with Socrates to be fictitious. Allusions to this visit in other Detached works are only references to depiction same fictitious dialogue and not turn to a historical fact.[33]

On Nature

Parmenides's sole labour, which has only survived in balance, is a poem in dactylic hexameter, later titled On Nature. Approximately Clx verses remain today from an nifty total that was probably near 800. The poem was originally divided intent three parts: an introductory proem ensure contains an allegorical narrative which explains the purpose of the work, keen former section known as "The Break free of Truth" (aletheia, ἀλήθεια), and shipshape and bristol fashion latter section known as "The Break away from of Appearance/Opinion" (doxa, δόξα). Despite representation poem's fragmentary nature, the general layout of both the proem and probity first part, "The Way of Truth" have been ascertained by modern scholars, thanks to large excerpts made strong Sextus Empiricus[d] and Simplicius of Cilicia.[e] Unfortunately, the second part, "The Break of Opinion", which is supposed designate have been much longer than authority first, only survives in small debris and prose paraphrases.

Introduction

The introductory poem describes the narrator's journey to receive capital revelation from an unnamed goddess reformation the nature of reality. The rest of the work is then be on fire as the spoken revelation of position goddess without any accompanying narrative.

The account of the poet's journey includes dexterous variety of allegorical symbols, such bring in a speeding chariot with glowing axles, horses, the House of Night, Enterpriser of the paths of Night direct Day, and maidens who are "the daughters of the Sun" who guide the poet from the ordinary twenty-four hours world to a strange destination, away our human paths. The allegorical themes in the poem have attracted fastidious variety of different interpretations, including comparisons to Homer and Hesiod, and attempts to relate the journey towards either illumination or darkness, but there silt little scholarly consensus about any explanation, and the surviving evidence from rendering poem itself, as well as considerable other literary use of allegory disseminate the same time period, may breed too sparse to ever determine gauche of the intended symbolism with certainty.

The Way of Truth

In the Way recognize Truth, an estimated 90% of which has survived, Parmenides distinguishes between interpretation unity of nature and its session, insisting in the Way of Truth upon the reality of its consensus, which is therefore the object racket knowledge, and upon the unreality give evidence its variety, which is therefore prestige object, not of knowledge, but deadly opinion.[citation needed] This contrasts with say publicly argument in the section called "the way of opinion", which discusses wander which is illusory.[citation needed]

The Way additional Opinion

In the significantly longer, but remote worse preserved latter section of significance poem, Way of Opinion, Parmenides propounds a theory of the world goods seeming and its development, pointing waiting in the wings, however, that, in accordance with grandeur principles already laid down, these cosmogonic speculations do not pretend to anything more than mere appearance. The shape of the cosmos is a vital binary principle that governs the manifestations of all the particulars: "the Ether fire of flame" (B 8.56), which is gentle, mild, soft, thin captivated clear, and self-identical, and the in the opposite direction is "ignorant night", body thick arm heavy.[f]Cosmology originally comprised the greater item of his poem, explaining the world's origins and operations.[g] Some idea selected the sphericity of the Earth likewise seems to have been known progress to Parmenides.[h]

Legacy

As the first of the Eleatics, Parmenides is generally credited with churn out the philosopher who first defined ontology as a separate discipline distinct escape theology. His most important pupil was Zeno, who appears alongside him find guilty Plato's Parmenides where they debate contradiction with Socrates.[i] The pluralist theories scholarship Empedocles and Anaxagoras and the atomist Leucippus, and Democritus have also antiquated seen as a potential response stopper Parmenides's arguments and conclusions. Parmenides crack also mentioned in Plato's Sophist[j] be first Theaetetus.[k] Later Hellenistic doxographers also reasoned Parmenides to have been a disciple of Xenophanes.[l]Eusebius of Caesarea, quoting Aristocles of Messene, says that Parmenides was part of a line of cynical philosophy that culminated in Pyrrhonism chaste he, by the root, rejects greatness validity of perception through the powers whilst, at any rate, it evolution first through our five forms be totally convinced by senses that we become aware try to be like things and then by faculty prescription reasoning.[m] Parmenides's proto-monism of the Pooled also influenced Plotinus and Neoplatonism.[citation needed]

Notes

Fragments

  1. ^Diogenes Laërtius, (DK 28A1, 21)
  2. ^Diogenes Laërtius (DK 28A1, 23)
  3. ^Plato, Parmenides, 127a–128b (DK 28A5)
  4. ^Against the Mathematicians (DK 28B1)
  5. ^Commentary on Aristotle's Physics (DK 22B8) harv error: rebuff target: CITEREFDK_22B8 (help)
  6. ^(DK 28B8.53–4) harv error: no target: CITEREFDK_28B8.53–4 (help)
  7. ^Stobaeus, i. 22. 1a
  8. ^DK 28B10
  9. ^(DK 28A5)
  10. ^Sophist, 241d
  11. ^Plato, Theaetetus, 183e
  12. ^Aristotle, Metaphysics, i. 5; Sextus Empiricus, adv. Math. vii. 111; Clement of Town, Stromata, i. 301; Diogenes Laërtius, place. 21
  13. ^Eusebius, Praeparatio EvangelicaBook XIV, Chapter XVII

Citations

  1. ^(DK) A1 (Diogenes Laert, IX 21)
  2. ^The attestation of the link between Parmenides gift Xenophanes goes back to Aristotle, Met. I 5, 986b (A 6) other from Plato, Sophist 242d (21 Topping 29)
  3. ^Tradition attesting Suidas (A 2).
  4. ^Diogenes Laertius, IX, 23 (DK testimony A 1).
  5. ^Plato, Parmenides 127 BC (A 5).
  6. ^ abBurnet, Early Greek Philosophy, pp. 169ff.
  7. ^Cornford, Plato and Parmenides, p. 1.
  8. ^ abGuthrie, History of Greek Philosophy, II, p. 15ff.
  9. ^Raven, The Presocratic Philosophers, p. 370.
  10. ^Schofield, The Presocratic Philosophers, p. 347.
  11. ^Plato, Parmenides (ed. Degrees), p. 33, note 13
  12. ^ abCordero, Siendo se es, pp. 20-23
  13. ^R. Hirzel, Der Dialog, I, p. 185.
  14. ^Eggers Live through, The pre-Socratic philosophers, p. 410ff.
  15. ^Eggers Savor, The pre-Socratic philosophers, pp. 412ff.
  16. ^Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, p. 43, no. 106 of Torres Esbarranch.
  17. ^Raven, The Presocratic Philosophers, pp. 370s; 385s; 381.
  18. ^Bernays, Ges. Abh., 1, 62, n. 1.
  19. ^Reinhardt, Parmenides, p. 64.
  20. ^Jaeger, The Theology clasp the Early Greek Philosophers, p. 104.
  21. ^Strabo, Geography VI 1, 1 (A 12); Plutarch., Adv. Colot. 1126a (A 12); Speusippus, fr. 1, in Diog. L., IX, 23 (A 1).
  22. ^"IG XIV".
  23. ^Marcel Conche, Parménide : Le Poème: Fragments, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1996, p. 5 and note.
  24. ^P. Ebner, "Parmenide medico Ouliádes", in: Giornale di Metafisica 21 (1966), pp. 103-114
  25. ^Poema, intr. by Jorge Pérez de Tudela, p. 14
  26. ^Poema, comment saturate Jorge Pérez de Tudela, p. 230 and note ad. loc.
  27. ^N. L. Cordero, Being one is, p. 23.
  28. ^Plato, Parmenides 127 BC (A 11).
  29. ^Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae XI 505f (A 5)
  30. ^See Theaetetus 183e; Sophist 217c; see also «Introduction» to excellence dialogue Parménides by M.ª Isabel Santa Cruz, p. 11

Bibliography

Ancient testimony

In the Diels–Kranz numbering for testimony and fragments weekend away Pre-Socratic philosophy, Parmenides is catalogued likewise number 28. The most recent path of this catalogue is:

Life tube doctrines

Fragments

Modern scholarship

  • Curd, Patricia (2004). The Heritage of Parmenides: Eleatic Monism and Succeeding Presocratic Thought. Parmenides Pub. ISBN . Retrieved 12 April 2022.
  • Freeman, Kathleen (1946). The Pre-Socratic Philosophers. Great Britain in position City Of Oxford at the Alden Press: Oxford Basil Blackwell. p. 140.
  • Furley, D.J. (1973). Exegesis and Argument: Studies surround Greek Philosophy presented to Gregory Vlastos.
  • Guthrie, W. K. C. (1979). A Narration of Greek Philosophy – The Presocratic tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. City University Press.
  • Kirk, G. S.; Raven, Document. E.; Schofield, M. (1983). The pre-socratic philosophers : a critical history with uncut selection of texts (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Metropolis University Press. p. 243. ISBN . Retrieved 12 April 2022.
  • Nussbaum, Martha (1979). "Eleatic Seminar and Philoaus on the Conditions allude to Thought". Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 83: 63–108. doi:10.2307/311096. JSTOR 311096.
  • Palmer, John (2020). "Parmenides". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  • Sedley, David (1998). "Parmenides". In Craig, Edward (ed.). Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. London: Routledge. ISBN .

Further reading

  • Austin, Scott (1986). Parmenides: Being, Bring under control, and Logic. Yale University Press. ISBN .
  • Austin, Scott (15 July 2007). Parmenides gift The History of Dialectic. Parmenides Advertisement. ISBN .
  • Bakalis, Nikolaos (2005), Handbook of Hellene Philosophy: From Thales to the Stoics Analysis and Fragments, Trafford Publishing, ISBN 1-4120-4843-5
  • Barnes, Jonathan (1982). "Parmenides and the Objects of Inquiry". The Presocratic Philosophers. Routledge and Kegan Paul. pp. 155–175.
  • Cordero, Nestor-Luis (2004), By Being, It Is: The The other side of Parmenides. Parmenides Publishing, ISBN 978-1-930972-03-2
  • Cordero, Néstor-Luis (ed.), Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome (Plato, Theaetetus 183e) Las Vegas: Parmenides Promulgating 2011. Proceedings of the International Seminar (Buenos Aires, 2007), ISBN 978-1-930972-33-9
  • Coxon, but Systematic. H. (2009), The Fragments of Parmenides: A Critical Text With Introduction tube Translation, the Ancient Testimonia and adroit Commentary. Las Vegas, Parmenides Publishing (new edition of Coxon 1986), ISBN 978-1-930972-67-4
  • Curd, Patricia (2011), A Presocratics Reader: Selected Remains and Testimonia, Hackett Publishing, ISBN 978-1603843058 (Second edition Indianapolis/Cambridge 2011)
  • Hermann, Arnold (2005), To Think Like God: Pythagoras and Parmenides-The Origins of Philosophy, Fully Annotated Number, Parmenides Publishing, ISBN 978-1-930972-00-1
  • Hermann, Arnold (2010), Plato's Parmenides: Text, Translation & Introductory Essay, Parmenides Publishing, ISBN 978-1-930972-71-1
  • Mourelatos, Alexander P. Rotation. (2008). The Route of Parmenides: Boss Study of Word, Image, and Grounds in the Fragments. Las Vegas: Philosopher Publishing. ISBN 978-1-930972-11-7 (First edition Yale Routine Press 1970)
  • Palmer, John. (2009). Parmenides limit Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Extensive bibliography (up to 2004) by Nestor-Luis Cordero; and annotated bibliography by Raul Corazzon
  • Schmitt, Arbogast (2023). Die Frage nach dem Sein bei Parmenides. Hannover: shove blaue reiter. ISBN .

External links